What a shame. And the close here. "A difficult subject treated too superficially." I can not find better words than those that left the mouth of a young man just finished the movie. Hereafter has been hailed by several critics, among them my favorite Roberto Escobar as a masterpiece. A sort of final perfection in impeccable filmography Clint Eastwood's great . Are not of this opinion. I'm no expert, but a subject as sensitive and controversial as to what's in the afterlife can not be addressed as done in the Hereafter. Not enough to put in the pillory many charlatans and it is not so much wanting solutions to a thorny question.
The film tells three stories that share the theme of death. Because the journalist saw her face lasted a tsunami, the child died because the twin and Matt Damon because he is a medium and psychic. The circularity of the stories will take them for reasons other then to meet again in London. I found
banal and even a little 'irritating way to treat the story of female lead. The director, in an almost didactic, even he is forced to make him say during a dialogue at the dinner. "Six months ago I was rich, famous, I had you ..." In addition to losing everything, even removed the billboards and also loses her love.
pity. For someone like Clint Eastwood, and after the shot works so far, we expected something really strong and provocative. He did not succeed. America cinema turns to the paranormal. Woody Allen has made a rambling, but interesting to play, he tried now a giant, but the road there is still much to do ...
pity. For someone like Clint Eastwood, and after the shot works so far, we expected something really strong and provocative. He did not succeed. America cinema turns to the paranormal. Woody Allen has made a rambling, but interesting to play, he tried now a giant, but the road there is still much to do ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment